Double Standards in Lane Enforcement

I sent a sizzling letter to The Herald this last week, but they declined to publish.What did I say wrong? Never mind, here it is.


Dear Letters

There seems to be some very specific priorities set in the legal enforcement of who may use sections of our roads network. In yesterday’s Herald it was reported that across the UK one million fines are handed out every year to drivers for illegal use of bus-only lanes. Glasgow alone had an astonishing 339,000 fines for inappropriate bus lane use.

I do not quibble with the imposition of these fines but I would like to point out the very selective nature of this penalisation, given that there seems to be no sanction on drivers who drive in cycle lanes or drivers who park and obstruct pavements. The Highway Code is unequivocal in stating that drivers must never drive in cycle lanes marked by a solid line, or only drive in those marked by dashed lines if unavoidable. Similarly, the Highway Code is clear that one can never drive onto a pavement to park. Drivers ignore these obligations as a matter of course and the police almost never enforce them.

Whilst I would not relish the headline that one million drivers had been fined for pavement parking or driving in a cycle lane, it would at least indicate that the legal system is taking the rights of pedestrians and cyclists as seriously as those of the bus network. Active travel (walking and cycling) will never become a reality in Glasgow unless we start by making the existing cycle ways and pavements safe, vehicle-free places. What is the point in building, for example, another cycle lane if it’s to be used by cars?

4 thoughts on “Double Standards in Lane Enforcement

  1. Your letter was good, surely that you had some long sentences couldn’t be the reason for lack of publication.

    Police kindly looked at a car in my street parked on the pavement recently and said that as a buggy could get past they had no powers to get it removed. Is the Highway Code mandatory, is its guidance obligatory? One website says ‘many’ rules are legal requirements, perhaps your letter didn’t pass the legal check.

    But I’m sure that each letter alerts editors to important issues and makes the possibility of future publication more likely. So I’ll keep writing as opportunities present themselves.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s