Given that GCC has been seriously pushing the boundaries of what can be considered part of the cycle network https://glasgowcycleman.wordpress.com/2015/06/16/305km-of-cycle-network-you-kidding/, I think that the cycling fraternity should have a clear definition of what can and cannot be included as part of a valid cycle route. I offer the following criteria that should be met before a route/facility can be accepted as a valid part of the cycle network.
-
Is a reasonably direct route that connects locations that a significant number of people wish to travel to and from,
-
Offers increased safety compared to the on-road or unsegregated alternatives (e.g. no lanes marked in the car-door zone),
-
Clearly marked so that visitors to the area can easily find them,
-
Can be cycled by all users including tandem and tricycle riders,
-
Maintained and kept clear of debris such as glass, gravel, snow and ice.
Does your local cycle lane(s) pass these simple tests?
2 thoughts on “What constitutes a cycle route?”